Government Performance Management
Web Site Overview
 
About John Mercer
Background & Experience
Comments of Others
News Articles
International
 
Performance-Based Budgeting
Overview
CASCADE™ Performance Based Budgeting Software
Guide to Performance Budgeting System
White Paper Instructions for PDF documents
Model Performance
Budgeting System
Performance Budget Examples
ABC/M for Federal Agencies
ABC/M Compliance
 
Government Performance
and Results Act
Overview
GPRA Text Instructions for PDF documents
GPRA Report Instructions for PDF documents
Congressional Testimony Instructions for PDF documents
The Big Picture of Federal Management Reform
 
President's Management Agenda
Overview
December 2007 Scorecard
Strategic Management of Human Capital
Competitive Sourcing
Improved Financial Performance
Expanded Electronic Government
Budget and Performance Integration
BPI - The Reform
BPI - Expected Results
 
OMB's Program Assessment Rating Tool
Overview
PART Questions
PART Instructions Instructions for PDF documents
PART Program Ratings Instructions for PDF documents
 
Congressional Oversight
Press Release
Scorecard
 
Services & Clients
GSA Schedule

Get Acrobat Reader

Web site designed
by Jean-Marie Slove

Activity Based Costing/Management for Federal Agencies

In 1995, the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) issued a recommended accounting standard titled "Managerial Cost Accounting Concepts and Standards for the Federal Government". This standard was subsequently adopted by OMB and GAO and made binding on federal agencies effective beginning in 1998.

From the first paragraph of the FASAB standard, it is clear that this reform is seen as being of fundamental importance to all program managers, and not just to the agency's accountants.

"1. The managerial cost accounting concepts and standards contained in this statement are aimed at providing reliable and timely information on the full cost of federal program, their activities, and outputs. The cost information can be used by the congress and federal executives in making decisions about allocating federal resources, authorizing and modifying programs, and evaluating program performance. The cost information can also be used by program managers in making managerial decisions to improve operating economy and efficiency."

Today this managerial cost accounting standard parallels many of the issues addressed in OMB's Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART), including the acknowledged relationship to GPRA and the emphasis on identifying the unit costs of activities, as shown in the following paragraph from that standard:

"16. The Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990 includes among the functions of chief financial officers 'the development and reporting of cost information' and 'the systematic measurement of performance.' In July 1993, Congress passed the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) which mandates performance measurement by federal agencies. In September 1993, in his report to the President on the National Performance Review (NPR), Vice President Al Gore recommended an action which required the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board to issue a set of cost accounting standards for all federal activities. Those standards will provide a method for identifying the unit cost of all government activities."

A major theme of the PART is OMB's strong interest in assessing the efficiency and cost effectiveness of federal programs. The federal cost accounting standard explains that the key to such determinations is being able to measure the unit costs of outputs and outcomes.

"35. Measuring costs is an integral part of measuring performance in terms of efficiency and effectiveness. Efficiency is measured by relating outputs to inputs. It is often expressed by cost per unit of output. While effectiveness in itself is measured by the outcome or degree to which a predetermined objective is met, it is commonly combined with cost information to show 'cost-effectiveness'."

In order to identify the unit costs of their activities, this accounting standard urges federal agencies to consider activity-based costing (ABC) and activity-based cost management (ABC/M) as part of their GPRA performance measurement.

"147. Several costing methodologies have been successful in the private sector and in some government entities. Four are briefly described below for agency consideration. It should be noted that Activity-Based Costing has gained broad acceptance by manufacturing and service industries as an effective managerial tool. Federal entities are encouraged to study its potential within their own operations."

"149. Implementing an ABC system requires four major steps: (1) identify activities performed in a responsibility segment to produce outputs, (2) assign or map resources to the activities, (3) identify outputs for which the activities are performed, and (4) assign activity costs to the outputs."

Unfortunately, despite the fundamental importance of this cost accounting reform, the General Accounting Office notes that few federal agencies have achieved meaningful compliance.

John Mercer used his experience in a sophisticated system of governmental activity-based costing and activity-based cost management as an important reference point in his development of GPRA. Further information about the relationship of ABC and ABC/M to performance-based budgeting is found elsewhere on this web site. This information includes several performance budget examples that illustrate activity-based costing, a white paper on "Performance Budgeting for Federal Agencies" Instructions for PDF documents, and John Mercer's congressional testimony Instructions for PDF documents on GPRA implementation.